Download British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm: by Azar Gat (auth.) PDF

By Azar Gat (auth.)

Show description

Read or Download British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm: Revising the Revisionists PDF

Best conventional books

The Renaissance at War (Smithsonian History of Warfare)

The Renaissance at battle towards the top of the 15th century, smooth artillery and transportable firearms turned the signature guns of eu armies, appreciably changing the character of battle. the recent fingers remodeled society, too, as towns have been equipped and rebuilt to restrict the consequences of bombardment by means of cannon.

Dictionary of Sdi

Ebook by way of Waldman, Harry, Holdaway, Douglas

Roman military equipment

Rome's upward thrust to empire is frequently stated to have owed a lot to the potency and army ability of her armies and their technological superiority over barbarian enemies. yet simply how 'advanced' was once Roman army apparatus? What have been its origins and the way did it evolve? The authors of this ebook have collected a wealth of proof from all around the Roman Empire's excavated examples in addition to pictorial and documentary assets to give an image of what variety of apparatus will be on hand at any given time, what it'll seem like and the way it might functionality.

Drone warfare : the development of unmanned aerial conflict

An unmanned aerial car, generally known as a drone, is an plane with no human pilot on board. Its flight is both managed autonomously by means of desktops within the car, or less than the handheld remote control of a navigator or pilot at the floor or in one other car. Drone battle is likely one of the first books to envision the advance and use of such aerial drones.

Extra resources for British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm: Revising the Revisionists

Sample text

After 1940 Liddell Hart stressed that the Germans had applied the doctrine of armoured warfare which Fuller, himself and the other British armour pioneers had evolved from the 1920s. As we shall see, this was quite true. However, was not this fact much depreciated by Liddell Hart's loss of faith in the late 1930s in sweeping armoured offensives? Here, too, the answer is much more complex, and intriguing, than recent critics of Liddell Hart have allowed. In the first place, it ought to be made clear that Liddell Hart's advocacy of the strength of defence by no means involved a withdrawal from the idea of armoured warfare.

The official British historian who cites this wonders where Chamberlain found the inspiration for these views. B6 Responsibility for the collapse of France could at least partly be laid at Liddell Hart's door. Consequently, his prestige suffered heavily and justly. s? ss He Liddell Hart's Theory of Armoured Warfare 25 argued, for example, that he had been obliged to conceal his real views about the Allies' weakness in order not to assist the enemy and that he had developed his preference for the defensive before the war because he had known that the Allies possessed no real offensive weapon in the form of large mechanized forces.

Contrary to lingering popular images, serious attention was given in France during those years to operational planning for mobile defence in depth. To be sure, French tank production was lagging, and the British armoured contribution failed to be ready in time for the Battle of France. Nevertheless, by the time of that battle, the French had been hastily creating their third and beginning to create their fourth DCR (Division Cuirassee de Reserve), which as their title indicate, were specifically intended for the counter-offensive role against the Panzer divisions and destined for deployment as a strong mobile Liddell Hart's Theory of Armoured Warfare 29 reserve in the area of Laon, Rheims, and Chalons-sur-Marne, at the centre of the French line.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.04 of 5 – based on 47 votes