By John R. Scudder, Anne H. Bishop
Explores deep intimate own relationships among women and men.
Read Online or Download Beyond Friendship and Eros: Unrecognized Relationships Between Men and Women (S U N Y Series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences) PDF
Best other social sciences books
Où situer los angeles joie de vivre ? remark donner un sens plus juste à nos mille émotions, désirs, passions ? Pour avancer sur ce chemin, laissez-vous emporter par le tourbillon des turpitudes affectives mis en scène par les héros tragiques puis analysé par les philosophes de l'Antiquité. Partez sur les lines de l. a. colère d'Achille, de l. a. douleur d'Antigone, du désespoir de Médée, de l'espérance d'Ulysse.
The assumption of natural Critique should be helpful to scholars of Kant in addition to these attracted to Deleuze and Guattari's contribution to philosophies of distinction. extra essentially, the booklet provides a chain of stimulating political and philosophical demanding situations to the apathy and indifference that pervade sleek existence.
E-book via Press, Irwin
- Analytic Philosophy in America: And Other Historical and Contemporary Essays
- Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions
- Creer a Partir du Neant
- Facing Backwards On The Problem Of Consciousness
- The Philosophy of Information: An Introduction
Extra resources for Beyond Friendship and Eros: Unrecognized Relationships Between Men and Women (S U N Y Series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences)
Men tend to think of friendship as doing something together, whereas, we women tend to think of friendship as enjoying each other. JACK: Well, I’m a man, and I would define friendship more as May does than as Lewis does, if I had to choose between them. But it’s possible to have both kinds of friends. I have friends that fit Lewis’s definition of friendship in that we like to think and argue together in pursuing the truth. I also have friends with whom I like to play tennis and fish. I would call this kind of friendship a side-by-side friendship, but I would not call such a relation friendship merely on the grounds that we enjoyed doing the same things together.
Werking certainly stresses the difficulty cross-sex friends have in avoiding romantic sexual relationships. Oddly, she fails to consider those cross-sex friendships in her study that did include sex, as the Michigan study did. JACK: Regardless of that significant omission, an important finding of Werking’s study is that cross-sex friendship can be more highly valued than relationships based on sex and romance. One man asserted that “his future romantic partner would need to accept his cross-sex friendship” (Werking 1997, 151).
But when the we-talk is primarily personal, then the legitimacy of our relationship comes into question. Do you find it difficult to form friendships with women with whom you are not as personally related as you are with Mary and me? Before I was married, I related to unmarried women as friends in a more personal way than most of my male friends. Even then, it was difficult to relate to women personally outside of courtship or marriage, because I was raised in a male world that tended to preclude close intimate relationships with women outside of courtship and marriage.